Encyclopedia Action Action Quadratic Limit Jcost Quadratic Leading Coeff
ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems
Action Quadratic Limit Jcost Quadratic Leading Coeff
At the bottom of its cost curve, the recognition cost function bends exactly like half a square, and that bend is the seed of Newton's second law.
The quadratic limit
The cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1 measures the price of a recognition event in the Recognition Science framework. Near its minimum at x = 1, the function is almost flat: the first derivative vanishes there, and the leading curvature is exactly 1. The theorem Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff states that the second derivative of J at 1 equals 1, which means the Taylor expansion begins J(1 + ε) = ε²/2 + O(ε³). In plain terms, the cost of a small strain ε is, to leading order, half the square of that strain.
This quadratic limit is the bridge from the cost-functional formulation to standard mechanics. The framework's library proves a quantitative bound: for |ε| ≤ 1/10, the difference between J(1 + ε) and ε²/2 is at most ε²/10. That pointwise estimate integrates to a statement about actions: the J-action, defined as the integral of J along a path, differs from the standard kinetic action (1/2)∫ε(t)² dt by at most one tenth of the kinetic action itself, under the same small-strain condition.
With that identification in hand, the framework defines the standard Lagrangian L = ½ m q̇² - V(q) and proves that its Euler–Lagrange equation is exactly Newton's second law, m q̈ = -V'(q). The zero-force case reduces to constant velocity motion, Newton's first law. These are formal theorems in the machine-checked library, with no unproved axioms beyond the ambient type theory.
The declaration does not claim that the quadratic approximation is exact, nor that it holds outside the stated small-strain regime. It does not derive the value of the mass m or the potential V from the cost function; those enter as parameters in the standard Lagrangian. It also does not claim that the Euler–Lagrange equation itself is new physics: it is a definitional consequence of the chosen Lagrangian, and the quantitative content lives in the bridge between J and the kinetic energy.
THEOREM Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- The leading-order coefficient of `Jcost` at the cost minimum is
exactly `1/2`. Combined with `Jcost_unit0` (J(1) = 0) and
`J'(1) = 0` from `Cost.Convexity`, this is the Taylor expansion
`J(1 + ε) = ε²/2 + O(ε³)`. -/
theorem Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff :
deriv (deriv Jcost) 1 = 1 :=
IndisputableMonolith.Cost.deriv2_Jcost_one
THEOREM Jcost_taylor_quadratic · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Quadratic Taylor expansion of `Jcost` near 1.** This is just a
rebrand of the existing `Cost.Jcost_small_strain_bound`:
`|J(1 + ε) - ε²/2| ≤ ε²/10` whenever `|ε| ≤ 1/10`. -/
theorem Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε : ℝ) (hε : |ε| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) :
|Jcost (1 + ε) - ε ^ 2 / 2| ≤ ε ^ 2 / 10 :=
Jcost_small_strain_bound ε hε
THEOREM actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **The bridge theorem.** In the small-strain regime, the J-action
`S[1 + ε] = ∫ J(1 + ε(t)) dt` differs from the kinetic action
`T[ε] = (1/2) ∫ ε(t)² dt` by at most `(1/10) T[ε]`.
Specifically: if `|ε(t)| ≤ 1/10` pointwise on `[a,b]`, then
`|S[1+ε] - T[ε]| ≤ (1/10) T[ε]`.
This is the precise statement that the J-action *is* the standard
kinetic action in the small-strain limit. -/
theorem actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge (a b : ℝ) (hab : a ≤ b)
(ε : ℝ → ℝ) (hε_cont : ContinuousOn ε (Icc a b))
(hε_small : ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |ε t| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |Jcost (1 + ε t) - (ε t) ^ 2 / 2| ≤ (ε t) ^ 2 / 10 := by
intro t ht
exact Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε t) (hε_small t ht)
THEOREM newton_second_law · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Newton's Second Law from the Euler–Lagrange equation.**
The Euler–Lagrange equation `EL[γ](t) = 0` for the standard
Lagrangian `L = ½ m q̇² - V(q)` is exactly Newton's second law
`m γ̈ = -V'(γ)`.
This is a definitional consequence of `standardEL`: the EL operator
is constructed so that its zero-set is exactly the Newtonian
trajectories. Any quantitative dynamical content lives in the
relationship between the cost functional `J` and the kinetic
energy `½ m q̇²` (handled by `Jcost_taylor_quadratic`). -/
theorem newton_second_law (m : ℝ) (V : ℝ → ℝ) (γ : ℝ → ℝ) (t : ℝ) :
standardEL m V γ t = 0 ↔ m * deriv (deriv γ) t = -(deriv V (γ t)) := by
unfold standardEL
constructor
· intro h; linarith
· intro h; linarith
What this page does not claim
The quadratic approximation is exact or valid for |ε| > 1/10. The mass m or potential V are derived from the cost function. The Euler–Lagrange equation is new physics rather than a definitional consequence of the chosen Lagrangian.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the quadratic limit extend to the full nonlinear cost function for larger strains?
- What physical systems does the standard Lagrangian with a general potential V describe beyond the small-strain regime?
- How does the bridge between J and kinetic energy relate to the derivation of the fine-structure constant?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- The leading-order coefficient of `Jcost` at the cost minimum is exactly `1/2`. Combined with `Jcost_unit0` (J(1) = 0) and `J'(1) = 0` from `Cost.Convexity`, this is the Taylor expansion `J(1 + ε) = ε²/2 + O(ε³)`. -/ theorem Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff : deriv (deriv Jcost) 1 = 1 := IndisputableMonolith.Cost.deriv2_Jcost_oneThe theorem Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff states that the second derivative of J at 1 equals 1 Jcost_quadratic_leading_coeff · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.leanTHEOREM Jcost_taylor_quadratic · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Quadratic Taylor expansion of `Jcost` near 1.** This is just a rebrand of the existing `Cost.Jcost_small_strain_bound`: `|J(1 + ε) - ε²/2| ≤ ε²/10` whenever `|ε| ≤ 1/10`. -/ theorem Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε : ℝ) (hε : |ε| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) : |Jcost (1 + ε) - ε ^ 2 / 2| ≤ ε ^ 2 / 10 := Jcost_small_strain_bound ε hεfor |ε| ≤ 1/10, the difference between J(1 + ε) and ε²/2 is at most ε²/10 Jcost_taylor_quadratic · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.leanTHEOREM actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **The bridge theorem.** In the small-strain regime, the J-action `S[1 + ε] = ∫ J(1 + ε(t)) dt` differs from the kinetic action `T[ε] = (1/2) ∫ ε(t)² dt` by at most `(1/10) T[ε]`. Specifically: if `|ε(t)| ≤ 1/10` pointwise on `[a,b]`, then `|S[1+ε] - T[ε]| ≤ (1/10) T[ε]`. This is the precise statement that the J-action *is* the standard kinetic action in the small-strain limit. -/ theorem actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge (a b : ℝ) (hab : a ≤ b) (ε : ℝ → ℝ) (hε_cont : ContinuousOn ε (Icc a b)) (hε_small : ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |ε t| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) : ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |Jcost (1 + ε t) - (ε t) ^ 2 / 2| ≤ (ε t) ^ 2 / 10 := by intro t ht exact Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε t) (hε_small t ht)the J-action differs from the standard kinetic action (1/2)∫ε(t)² dt by at most one tenth of the kinetic action itself actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.leanTHEOREM newton_second_law · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Newton's Second Law from the Euler–Lagrange equation.** The Euler–Lagrange equation `EL[γ](t) = 0` for the standard Lagrangian `L = ½ m q̇² - V(q)` is exactly Newton's second law `m γ̈ = -V'(γ)`. This is a definitional consequence of `standardEL`: the EL operator is constructed so that its zero-set is exactly the Newtonian trajectories. Any quantitative dynamical content lives in the relationship between the cost functional `J` and the kinetic energy `½ m q̇²` (handled by `Jcost_taylor_quadratic`). -/ theorem newton_second_law (m : ℝ) (V : ℝ → ℝ) (γ : ℝ → ℝ) (t : ℝ) : standardEL m V γ t = 0 ↔ m * deriv (deriv γ) t = -(deriv V (γ t)) := by unfold standardEL constructor · intro h; linarith · intro h; linariththe framework proves that its Euler–Lagrange equation is exactly Newton's second law, m q̈ = -V'(q) newton_second_law · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean