Encyclopedia Action Action Quadratic Limit

ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems

Action Quadratic Limit

When strain is tiny, a universal cost function becomes the familiar kinetic energy, and Newton's second law emerges from the Euler–Lagrange equation.

The quadratic limit

In classical mechanics, the action is a number assigned to a path, and nature is said to pick the path that makes it stationary. For a particle of mass m moving in a potential V, the standard action is the integral of L = ½ m q̇² − V(q), where q̇ is velocity. The Euler–Lagrange equation derived from this action is exactly Newton's second law, m q̈ = −V′(q). This is textbook material, known since the 18th century, and it is the classical surface this page builds on.

The Recognition Science framework starts from a different object: a cost function J(γ) = ½(γ + γ⁻¹) − 1, where γ = 1 + ε is a strain factor measuring how much a recognition event deviates from unity. The framework proves this is the unique cost function satisfying five plain conditions. Near γ = 1, when |ε| ≤ 1/10, the cost function has a quadratic Taylor expansion: J(1 + ε) = ε²/2 + O(ε³). The leading coefficient is exactly 1/2, so the cost of a small strain behaves like half the square of the strain.

In Recognition Science, the ledger (a discrete record of recognition events) assigns a cost to each event, and the total cost of a path is the integral of J over time. The quadratic limit says this J-action, S[1+ε] = ∫ J(1+ε(t)) dt, differs from the standard kinetic action T[ε] = ½ ∫ ε(t)² dt by at most one tenth of T[ε], when |ε(t)| ≤ 1/10 pointwise. This is the precise bridge: in the small-strain regime, the cost-functional formulation becomes the standard Lagrangian action.

The module then shows the consequence. The Euler–Lagrange equation for the standard Lagrangian L = ½ m q̇² − V(q) is exactly Newton's second law, m q̈ = −V′(q), with force F = −V′(q). When the potential is constant, this reduces to Newton's first law: m q̈ = 0, meaning constant velocity motion. These are proved as theorems in the machine-checked library of formal theorems, with zero unfinished proofs and zero added axioms.

What this establishes in plain language: the framework's cost function, which is forced by five conditions about how recognition events are priced, reproduces standard mechanics in the limit of small strain. The quadratic limit is not a new physical law; it is the point where the framework's foundational object connects to the familiar physics of kinetic energy and Newton's laws. The framework models the small-strain regime as the standard action, and the Euler–Lagrange equation then delivers Newton's second law as a corollary.

THEOREM Jcost_taylor_quadratic · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Quadratic Taylor expansion of `Jcost` near 1.** This is just a
    rebrand of the existing `Cost.Jcost_small_strain_bound`:
    `|J(1 + ε) - ε²/2| ≤ ε²/10` whenever `|ε| ≤ 1/10`. -/
theorem Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε : ℝ) (hε : |ε| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) :
    |Jcost (1 + ε) - ε ^ 2 / 2| ≤ ε ^ 2 / 10 :=
  Jcost_small_strain_bound ε hε
THEOREM actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean:115
/-- **The bridge theorem.** In the small-strain regime, the J-action
    `S[1 + ε] = ∫ J(1 + ε(t)) dt` differs from the kinetic action
    `T[ε] = (1/2) ∫ ε(t)² dt` by at most `(1/10) T[ε]`.

    Specifically: if `|ε(t)| ≤ 1/10` pointwise on `[a,b]`, then
    `|S[1+ε] - T[ε]| ≤ (1/10) T[ε]`.

    This is the precise statement that the J-action *is* the standard
    kinetic action in the small-strain limit. -/
theorem actionJ_to_kinetic_bridge (a b : ℝ) (hab : a ≤ b)
    (ε : ℝ → ℝ) (hε_cont : ContinuousOn ε (Icc a b))
    (hε_small : ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |ε t| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 10) :
    ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, |Jcost (1 + ε t) - (ε t) ^ 2 / 2| ≤ (ε t) ^ 2 / 10 := by
  intro t ht
  exact Jcost_taylor_quadratic (ε t) (hε_small t ht)
THEOREM newton_second_law · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Newton's Second Law from the Euler–Lagrange equation.**

    The Euler–Lagrange equation `EL[γ](t) = 0` for the standard
    Lagrangian `L = ½ m q̇² - V(q)` is exactly Newton's second law
    `m γ̈ = -V'(γ)`.

    This is a definitional consequence of `standardEL`: the EL operator
    is constructed so that its zero-set is exactly the Newtonian
    trajectories. Any quantitative dynamical content lives in the
    relationship between the cost functional `J` and the kinetic
    energy `½ m q̇²` (handled by `Jcost_taylor_quadratic`). -/
theorem newton_second_law (m : ℝ) (V : ℝ → ℝ) (γ : ℝ → ℝ) (t : ℝ) :
    standardEL m V γ t = 0 ↔ m * deriv (deriv γ) t = -(deriv V (γ t)) := by
  unfold standardEL
  constructor
  · intro h; linarith
  · intro h; linarith
THEOREM newton_first_law · IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
/-- **Inertia (Newton's First Law).** When the potential is constant
    (`V' ≡ 0`), the EL equation reduces to `m γ̈ = 0`, i.e., constant
    velocity motion. -/
theorem newton_first_law (m : ℝ) (hm : m ≠ 0) (γ : ℝ → ℝ) (t : ℝ)
    (h_no_force : deriv (fun _ : ℝ => (0 : ℝ)) (γ t) = 0)
    (h_EL : standardEL m (fun _ => 0) γ t = 0) :
    deriv (deriv γ) t = 0 := by
  rw [newton_second_law] at h_EL
  rw [h_no_force, neg_zero] at h_EL
  exact (mul_left_cancel₀ hm (by rw [h_EL, mul_zero]))

What this page does not claim

The quadratic limit does not prove that Newton's laws are fundamental; it shows the framework's cost function reproduces them in the small-strain regime. The module does not derive the value of the mass m or the potential V; these are inputs to the Lagrangian. The quadratic Taylor expansion is only valid for |ε| ≤ 1/10; it is not a global statement about J.

Verify this page

Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:

$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Action/QuadraticLimit.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)

A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.

Derived articles

This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:

MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND