Encyclopedia Chemistry Chemistry Ferromagnetism Fe Stoner Satisfied
ARTICLE 2 claims 1 theorem 1 model
Chemistry Ferromagnetism Fe Stoner Satisfied
A machine-checked proof shows iron satisfies the Stoner criterion, the inequality that marks the threshold for ferromagnetism.
Iron's Stoner condition
Ferromagnetism is the mechanism by which certain materials, such as iron, cobalt, and nickel, form permanent magnets and are attracted to magnets. It arises from the spontaneous alignment of atomic magnetic moments. The Stoner criterion is a simple condition that predicts when this alignment can occur: it requires the product of the exchange interaction strength (U) and the density of states at the Fermi level (D(E_F)) to be greater than 1. When U × D(E_F) > 1, the energy cost of aligning spins is overcome by the energy gain from exchange, and ferromagnetic order can set in.
In the Recognition Science framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems, the declaration fe_stoner_satisfied proves that for iron, this condition holds. The framework defines the Stoner interaction parameter for iron as 0.9 and the density of states at the Fermi level as 1.5. The proof calculates the product: 0.9 × 1.5 = 1.35, which is indeed greater than 1. This is a formal, verified result within the framework's ledger, a discrete record of recognition events. The declaration itself is a theorem, meaning it is a proved statement in the framework's system, not merely an assumption.
What this declaration does not claim is equally important. It does not prove that iron is ferromagnetic in the physical world. That is a separate statement, iron_ferromagnetic, which is also in the library. The Stoner criterion is a necessary condition for ferromagnetism, not a sufficient one. A material could satisfy the criterion yet fail to be ferromagnetic due to other factors. The declaration also does not derive the values 0.9 and 1.5 from first principles; these are chosen definitions within the framework, not results of a proof. It simply verifies that, given these defined values, the inequality holds.
The significance of this theorem is that it provides a formal, checkable instance of a physical criterion. It shows that the framework can encode and verify a standard result from condensed matter physics. The proof is a simple arithmetic calculation, but its value lies in being part of a larger, axiomatically clean system. It demonstrates that the framework's machinery can handle not just abstract mathematics but also concrete physical applications, even if the physical constants themselves are inputs rather than outputs.
THEOREM fe_stoner_satisfied · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean
/-- Fe satisfies Stoner criterion. -/
theorem fe_stoner_satisfied : stonerI_Fe * dos_Fe > 1 := by
simp only [stonerI_Fe, dos_Fe]
norm_num
MODEL stonerI_Fe · dos_Fe · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean
/-- Stoner parameter for Fe (eV). -/
def stonerI_Fe : ℝ := 0.9
/-- Density of states for Fe at Fermi level (states/eV/atom). -/
def dos_Fe : ℝ := 1.5
What this page does not claim
It does not prove that iron is ferromagnetic in the physical world; that is a separate theorem. It does not derive the values 0.9 and 1.5 from first principles; they are defined constants. It does not claim the Stoner criterion is sufficient for ferromagnetism, only necessary.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the framework derive the exchange interaction strength and density of states values for iron from more fundamental principles?
- What is the formal relationship between the Stoner criterion and the framework's eight-tick coherence structure?
- Does the framework provide a sufficient condition for ferromagnetism, or only the necessary Stoner criterion?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM fe_stoner_satisfied · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean
/-- Fe satisfies Stoner criterion. -/ theorem fe_stoner_satisfied : stonerI_Fe * dos_Fe > 1 := by simp only [stonerI_Fe, dos_Fe] norm_numThe declaration fe_stoner_satisfied proves that for iron, the Stoner criterion holds, with the product of the exchange interaction strength (0.9) and the density of states (1.5) being greater than 1. fe_stoner_satisfied · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.leanMODEL stonerI_Fe · dos_Fe · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean
/-- Stoner parameter for Fe (eV). -/ def stonerI_Fe : ℝ := 0.9/-- Density of states for Fe at Fermi level (states/eV/atom). -/ def dos_Fe : ℝ := 1.5The framework defines the Stoner interaction parameter for iron as 0.9 and the density of states at the Fermi level as 1.5. stonerI_Fe · dos_Fe · IndisputableMonolith/Chemistry/Ferromagnetism.lean