Encyclopedia Cosmology Cosmology Baryon Higher Order Corrected Decomposition
ARTICLE 4 claims 3 theorems 1 hypothesis
Cosmology Baryon Higher Order Corrected Decomposition
A machine-checked identity splits the baryon asymmetry prediction into a leading term and a small washout correction, without claiming the correction matches any measurement.
The corrected decomposition
The baryon asymmetry of the universe is the observed excess of matter over antimatter, usually written as the ratio η_B of baryon number density to entropy density. The Recognition Science framework derives a leading prediction for this ratio: η_B = φ⁻⁴⁴, where φ is the golden ratio. That number evaluates to about 6.376 × 10⁻¹⁰, which is about 4.5% higher than the Planck 2018 CMB measurement of (6.104 ± 0.058) × 10⁻¹⁰. Because the framework has no free parameters, this gap cannot be tuned away; the only way to address it is to compute a correction from the framework's own structure.
The correction comes from a washout mechanism. During the electroweak phase transition, sphaleron processes are active for about φ⁸ ≈ 47 cycles of the framework's eight-tick recognition cycle. Each cycle, the ledger, a discrete record of recognition events, reduces the defect by a factor δ = φ⁻⁸. Over all cycles, the net washout factor is (1 − δ)^N_sph, which the framework approximates as 1 − φ⁻⁸ ≈ 0.9853. The corrected prediction is therefore η_B^(1) = φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸), which evaluates to about 6.28 × 10⁻¹⁰, roughly halving the gap to the measured value.
The declaration corrected_decomposition is a theorem in the framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems. It states that the corrected value equals the leading value minus the leading value times the washout factor: η_B_corrected = η_B_phi_scale − η_B_phi_scale × δ_washout. The proof is a direct algebraic expansion, and the library also proves that the correction factor is positive and less than one, that the corrected value is positive, and that it is strictly smaller than the leading value. These are all formal facts about the defined quantities, not empirical claims.
What the declaration does not claim is equally important. The washout mechanism itself is a hypothesis, not a theorem. The framework's own epistemic status labels it as HYPOTHESIS with an explicit falsifier: if precision measurements establish η_B outside [5.5, 7.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at more than 5σ, the leading prediction is falsified; if η_B is outside [6.0, 6.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at more than 3σ, the corrected prediction is falsified. The decomposition theorem does not prove that the washout mechanism is physically real, nor that the corrected value matches any measurement. It only establishes the algebraic relationship between the defined quantities, leaving the physical interpretation and empirical status to the hypothesis and its falsifier.
THEOREM corrected_decomposition · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The corrected η_B = φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸) = φ⁻⁴⁴ − φ⁻⁵². -/
theorem corrected_decomposition :
eta_B_corrected = eta_B_phi_scale - eta_B_phi_scale * delta_washout := by
unfold eta_B_corrected correction_factor
ring
THEOREM correction_factor_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The correction factor lies strictly in (0, 1). -/
theorem correction_factor_in_interval :
0 < correction_factor ∧ correction_factor < 1 :=
⟨correction_factor_pos, correction_factor_lt_one⟩
THEOREM corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The corrected prediction is less than the leading term.
The 8-tick washout reduces η_B. -/
theorem corrected_lt_leading : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := by
unfold eta_B_corrected
have h1 : 0 < eta_B_phi_scale := eta_B_leading_pos
have h2 : correction_factor < 1 := correction_factor_lt_one
calc eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor
< eta_B_phi_scale * 1 := by
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h2 h1
_ = eta_B_phi_scale := mul_one _
HYPOTHESIS BaryonCorrectionCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- HYPOTHESIS: The 8-tick washout mechanism.
Physical basis: during the EW phase transition, sphalerons are active
for N_sph ≈ φ⁸ recognition cycles. Each cycle, R̂ reduces the baryon
excess by a factor δ = φ⁻⁸.
Epistemic status: HYPOTHESIS with falsifier
(η_B outside [6.0, 6.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at > 3σ would falsify this). -/
structure BaryonCorrectionCert where
/-- Leading term -/
leading : eta_B_phi_scale = phi ^ (-44 : ℤ)
/-- Correction factor -/
correction : correction_factor = 1 - phi ^ (-8 : ℤ)
/-- Corrected prediction -/
corrected_def : eta_B_corrected = eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor
/-- Correction is positive -/
correction_pos : 0 < correction_factor
/-- Correction is less than 1 -/
correction_lt_one : correction_factor < 1
/-- Corrected prediction is smaller -/
corrected_smaller : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale
/-- Corrected prediction is positive -/
corrected_pos : 0 < eta_B_corrected
/-- The correction term is at rung -52 -/
correction_rung : eta_B_phi_scale * delta_washout = phi ^ (-52 : ℤ)
What this page does not claim
The corrected value matches the Planck 2018 measurement within its error bars. The washout mechanism is a proven physical process; it is only a hypothesis. The framework derives the fine-structure constant or any other coupling constant.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical process, if any, realizes the eight-tick washout mechanism in the standard model of particle physics?
- How does the corrected prediction compare to the next-order correction, and does the series converge to the measured value?
- What experimental or observational program could test the falsifier bounds for the corrected prediction?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM corrected_decomposition · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The corrected η_B = φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸) = φ⁻⁴⁴ − φ⁻⁵². -/ theorem corrected_decomposition : eta_B_corrected = eta_B_phi_scale - eta_B_phi_scale * delta_washout := by unfold eta_B_corrected correction_factor ringThe corrected value equals the leading value minus the leading value times the washout factor: η_B_corrected = η_B_phi_scale − η_B_phi_scale × δ_washout. corrected_decomposition · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.leanTHEOREM correction_factor_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The correction factor lies strictly in (0, 1). -/ theorem correction_factor_in_interval : 0 < correction_factor ∧ correction_factor < 1 := ⟨correction_factor_pos, correction_factor_lt_one⟩The correction factor is positive and less than one. correction_factor_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.leanTHEOREM corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The corrected prediction is less than the leading term. The 8-tick washout reduces η_B. -/ theorem corrected_lt_leading : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := by unfold eta_B_corrected have h1 : 0 < eta_B_phi_scale := eta_B_leading_pos have h2 : correction_factor < 1 := correction_factor_lt_one calc eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor < eta_B_phi_scale * 1 := by apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h2 h1 _ = eta_B_phi_scale := mul_one _The corrected value is strictly smaller than the leading value. corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.leanHYPOTHESIS BaryonCorrectionCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- HYPOTHESIS: The 8-tick washout mechanism. Physical basis: during the EW phase transition, sphalerons are active for N_sph ≈ φ⁸ recognition cycles. Each cycle, R̂ reduces the baryon excess by a factor δ = φ⁻⁸. Epistemic status: HYPOTHESIS with falsifier (η_B outside [6.0, 6.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at > 3σ would falsify this). -/ structure BaryonCorrectionCert where /-- Leading term -/ leading : eta_B_phi_scale = phi ^ (-44 : ℤ) /-- Correction factor -/ correction : correction_factor = 1 - phi ^ (-8 : ℤ) /-- Corrected prediction -/ corrected_def : eta_B_corrected = eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor /-- Correction is positive -/ correction_pos : 0 < correction_factor /-- Correction is less than 1 -/ correction_lt_one : correction_factor < 1 /-- Corrected prediction is smaller -/ corrected_smaller : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale /-- Corrected prediction is positive -/ corrected_pos : 0 < eta_B_corrected /-- The correction term is at rung -52 -/ correction_rung : eta_B_phi_scale * delta_washout = phi ^ (-52 : ℤ)The washout mechanism is a hypothesis with an explicit falsifier. BaryonCorrectionCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean