Encyclopedia Cosmology Cosmology Inflation Spectral Index From Jcost Ns Rs Gt Zero
ARTICLE 4 claims 3 theorems 1 model
Cosmology Inflation Spectral Index From Jcost Ns Rs Gt Zero
A machine-checked theorem proves a proposed cosmic number is positive, but the number itself remains a model, not a measurement.
The spectral index bound
In cosmology, the spectral index n_s describes how density fluctuations in the early universe varied with scale, with 1 meaning perfectly uniform variation. The Planck 2018 satellite data measured n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004. The declaration nsRS_gt_zero is a small formal theorem: it proves that a proposed value for this index, defined as 1 - 2/45, is greater than zero. The proof is a direct calculation: since 2/45 is about 0.0444, subtracting it from 1 leaves roughly 0.956, which is clearly positive.
The value itself comes from the Recognition Science framework, which models reality as a ledger, a discrete record of recognition events. Within that framework, the number 45 is called gap45, described as a body-plan ceiling. The proposed spectral index is then n_s = 1 - 2/gap45, giving 0.956. A companion theorem, nsRS_band, proves this value lies strictly between 0.955 and 0.957. Another theorem, nsRS_near_planck, proves this is within 0.015 of the Planck value, a numerical agreement the framework's documentation describes as close but not exact.
What nsRS_gt_zero does not claim is equally important. It does not prove the spectral index is 0.956. It only proves that a particular defined number is positive. The framework's own notes acknowledge the Planck central value of 0.965 sits above the proposed band, and a simple alternative formula using 60 e-folds gives 0.967, closer to the data. The definition of gap45 as 45 is a modeling choice, not a derived result. The theorem's strength is narrow: it certifies the arithmetic of a definition, not the physical correctness of that definition.
For a reader, the practical takeaway is that the framework offers a concrete, checkable number for the spectral index, and the machine-checked library of formal theorems confirms the basic facts about that number: it is positive, less than one, and within a stated band. Whether that number matches the universe is a separate question, one the formal theorems do not settle.
THEOREM nsRS_gt_zero · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
theorem nsRS_gt_zero : nsRS > 0 := by
unfold nsRS gap45; norm_num
THEOREM nsRS_band · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
/-- n_s_RS ∈ (0.955, 0.957). -/
theorem nsRS_band : (0.955 : ℝ) < nsRS ∧ nsRS < 0.957 := by
rw [nsRS_val]; norm_num
THEOREM nsRS_near_planck · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
theorem nsRS_near_planck : |nsRS - nsPlanck| < 0.015 := by
rw [nsRS_val]
unfold nsPlanck
rw [abs_lt]
constructor <;> norm_num
MODEL gap45 · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
/-- Gap-45 = body-plan ceiling = 45. -/
def gap45 : ℕ := 45
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not prove the spectral index equals 0.956. The theorem does not establish that the framework's model is physically correct. The value 45 is defined, not derived from the framework's axioms.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- Where does the number 45 come from in the framework's derivation?
- What physical interpretation does the framework give to the gap45 ceiling?
- How would the framework adjust its prediction to match the Planck central value of 0.965?
- Is the near-agreement within 0.015 statistically meaningful given the Planck error of 0.004?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM nsRS_gt_zero · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
theorem nsRS_gt_zero : nsRS > 0 := by unfold nsRS gap45; norm_numThe declaration nsRS_gt_zero is a small formal theorem: it proves that a proposed value for this index, defined as 1 - 2/45, is greater than zero. nsRS_gt_zero · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.leanTHEOREM nsRS_band · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
/-- n_s_RS ∈ (0.955, 0.957). -/ theorem nsRS_band : (0.955 : ℝ) < nsRS ∧ nsRS < 0.957 := by rw [nsRS_val]; norm_numA companion theorem, nsRS_band, proves this value lies strictly between 0.955 and 0.957. nsRS_band · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.leanTHEOREM nsRS_near_planck · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
theorem nsRS_near_planck : |nsRS - nsPlanck| < 0.015 := by rw [nsRS_val] unfold nsPlanck rw [abs_lt] constructor <;> norm_numAnother theorem, nsRS_near_planck, proves this is within 0.015 of the Planck value. nsRS_near_planck · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.leanMODEL gap45 · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean
/-- Gap-45 = body-plan ceiling = 45. -/ def gap45 : ℕ := 45The definition of gap45 as 45 is a modeling choice, not a derived result. gap45 · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/InflationSpectralIndexFromJCost.lean