Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Gauge Group Cube Gauge Cube Cert
ARTICLE 3 claims 2 theorems 1 model
Foundation Gauge Group Cube Gauge Cube Cert
A machine-checked certificate ties the ranks of the three known force groups to the geometry of a cube.
The cube certificate
The standard model of particle physics groups its forces under three symmetries: SU(3) for the strong force, SU(2) for the weak force, and U(1) for electromagnetism. Each symmetry has a rank, a count of independent directions it can rotate. SU(3) has rank 3, SU(2) has rank 2, and U(1) has rank 1. Their total rank is 6.
Recognition Science, a framework that derives physical structure from the cost of storing a discrete record of events, offers a geometric reading of those numbers. Its machine-checked library of formal theorems contains a declaration called GaugeCubeCert, a certificate that packages four facts about the ranks. The certificate states that the three ranks sum to 6, that they are exactly 3, 2, and 1, that the SU(3) rank equals the number of face-pair directions of a three-dimensional cube, and that the ranks form a decreasing sequence. A cube has three pairs of opposite faces, which gives the 3; its two principal sub-cube orientations give the 2; and a single overall phase gives the 1.
The certificate does not derive the existence of the gauge groups or their interactions. It takes the ranks as defined constants and proves the arithmetic and geometric identities among them. The uniqueness claim it carries is narrow: (3, 2, 1) is the only decreasing partition of 6 into three parts whose first part equals the spatial dimension 3. That is a statement about integer partitions, not about the physical content of the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces.
What the certificate establishes is consistency. It shows that the rank structure of the standard model's gauge groups can be read off the symmetries of a cube, within the framework's own definitions. It does not predict the existence of those forces, nor does it explain why the gauge group is SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) rather than some other group with the same ranks. The certificate is a formal bookkeeping check, not a physical derivation.
THEOREM GaugeCubeCert · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
structure GaugeCubeCert where
total_rank : gaugeRankSU3 + gaugeRankSU2 + gaugeRankU1 = 6
decomp : gaugeRankSU3 = 3 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 = 2 ∧ gaugeRankU1 = 1
su3_from_cube : gaugeRankSU3 = cubeFacePairs
decreasing_partition : gaugeRankSU3 ≥ gaugeRankSU2 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 ≥ gaugeRankU1
MODEL gaugeRankSU3 · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
/-- The three gauge group ranks. -/
def gaugeRankSU3 : ℕ := 3
THEOREM unique_321_partition_example · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
/-- The (3,2,1) partition is the unique decreasing partition of 6 into 3 parts
where first part = D = 3. -/
theorem unique_321_partition_example :
gaugeRankSU3 = 3 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 = 2 ∧ gaugeRankU1 = 1 ∧
gaugeRankSU3 ≥ gaugeRankSU2 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 ≥ gaugeRankU1 := by
decide
What this page does not claim
The certificate does not derive the existence of the gauge groups or their interactions. It does not predict the gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) as opposed to any other group with the same ranks. The certificate is not a physical derivation of the strong, weak, or electromagnetic forces.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical content, if any, does the rank decomposition add beyond the standard model's own group theory?
- How does the framework connect the cube's face-pair count to the spatial dimension of three?
- Does the framework derive the gauge group's full structure, including its couplings, from the cube geometry?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM GaugeCubeCert · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
structure GaugeCubeCert where total_rank : gaugeRankSU3 + gaugeRankSU2 + gaugeRankU1 = 6 decomp : gaugeRankSU3 = 3 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 = 2 ∧ gaugeRankU1 = 1 su3_from_cube : gaugeRankSU3 = cubeFacePairs decreasing_partition : gaugeRankSU3 ≥ gaugeRankSU2 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 ≥ gaugeRankU1The certificate states that the three ranks sum to 6, that they are exactly 3, 2, and 1, that the SU(3) rank equals the number of face-pair directions of a three-dimensional cube, and that the ranks form a decreasing sequence. GaugeCubeCert · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.leanMODEL gaugeRankSU3 · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
/-- The three gauge group ranks. -/ def gaugeRankSU3 : ℕ := 3A cube has three pairs of opposite faces, which gives the 3; its two principal sub-cube orientations give the 2; and a single overall phase gives the 1. gaugeRankSU3 · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.leanTHEOREM unique_321_partition_example · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean
/-- The (3,2,1) partition is the unique decreasing partition of 6 into 3 parts where first part = D = 3. -/ theorem unique_321_partition_example : gaugeRankSU3 = 3 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 = 2 ∧ gaugeRankU1 = 1 ∧ gaugeRankSU3 ≥ gaugeRankSU2 ∧ gaugeRankSU2 ≥ gaugeRankU1 := by decideThe uniqueness claim it carries is narrow: (3, 2, 1) is the only decreasing partition of 6 into three parts whose first part equals the spatial dimension 3. unique_321_partition_example · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeGroupCube.lean