Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Pair Kernel Recognition Transport Residuals S18 Misclassified Five Ca
ARTICLE 2 claims 2 theorems
Foundation Pair Kernel Recognition Transport Residuals S18 Misclassified Five Ca
A machine-checked theorem shows that a five-channel carrier misclassifies events, but it does not say which carrier is correct.
Carrier completeness
A carrier is a rule that assigns each recognized event to a parent channel. In the framework's library, a carrier is complete only if its assignment is both injective and surjective: no two distinct events collapse into one parent, and no parent goes without an event. The theorem misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective proves that a specific five-channel carrier fails the surjective half of that test. The failure is not a numerical accident; it is a machine-checked consequence of the carrier's definition.
The proof is one of three companion results. Two other carriers fail the injective half, and the same five-channel carrier also fails injectivity. Together the three theorems show that carrier completeness splits into two independent conditions, each with its own counterexample. The framework's library records these as formal theorems, not as empirical observations.
What the theorem does not claim is just as important. It does not say that the five-channel carrier is the wrong choice for physics, nor that any other carrier is the right one. It establishes only a negative fact: this carrier, under the framework's definition of surjectivity, is not complete. The theorem leaves open which carrier, if any, the physical world selects.
THEOREM carrierComplete_iff_injective_and_surjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean
theorem carrierComplete_iff_injective_and_surjective
{N : ℕ} [NeZero N]
(physical : PostingPhysicalChannelCarrier3 N) :
PostingCarrierCoherenceComplete3 physical ↔
PostingCarrierParentInjective3 physical ∧
PostingCarrierParentSurjective3 physical := by
constructor
· intro hcomplete
exact
⟨fun event => (hcomplete event).1,
fun event => (hcomplete event).2⟩
· rintro ⟨hinjective, hsurjective⟩ event
exact
⟨hinjective event, hsurjective event⟩
THEOREM misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean
theorem misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective :
¬ PostingCarrierParentSurjective3
(misclassifiedFiveChannelCarrier3 3) := by
intro hsurjective
obtain ⟨pair, hpair⟩ :=
realizedPrimitivePostingPair3_exists
let event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3 := ⟨pair, hpair⟩
obtain ⟨channel, hchannel⟩ :=
hsurjective event
(Sum.inr (1 : Fin 2))
change
Sum.inr (0 : Fin 2) =
Sum.inr (1 : Fin 2) at hchannel
have hfin : (0 : Fin 2) = 1 :=
Sum.inr.inj hchannel
norm_num at hfin
What this page does not claim
The five-channel carrier is the physically correct one. Any other specific carrier is complete. The theorem identifies which parent channels are missing events.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- Which carrier, if any, does the framework prove to be complete for physical channels?
- What physical interpretation does the framework attach to a carrier that fails surjectivity?
- Does the framework's library contain a carrier that passes both injectivity and surjectivity?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM carrierComplete_iff_injective_and_surjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean
theorem carrierComplete_iff_injective_and_surjective {N : ℕ} [NeZero N] (physical : PostingPhysicalChannelCarrier3 N) : PostingCarrierCoherenceComplete3 physical ↔ PostingCarrierParentInjective3 physical ∧ PostingCarrierParentSurjective3 physical := by constructor · intro hcomplete exact ⟨fun event => (hcomplete event).1, fun event => (hcomplete event).2⟩ · rintro ⟨hinjective, hsurjective⟩ event exact ⟨hinjective event, hsurjective event⟩A carrier is complete only if its assignment is both injective and surjective. carrierComplete_iff_injective_and_surjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.leanTHEOREM misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean
theorem misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective : ¬ PostingCarrierParentSurjective3 (misclassifiedFiveChannelCarrier3 3) := by intro hsurjective obtain ⟨pair, hpair⟩ := realizedPrimitivePostingPair3_exists let event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3 := ⟨pair, hpair⟩ obtain ⟨channel, hchannel⟩ := hsurjective event (Sum.inr (1 : Fin 2)) change Sum.inr (0 : Fin 2) = Sum.inr (1 : Fin 2) at hchannel have hfin : (0 : Fin 2) = 1 := Sum.inr.inj hchannel norm_num at hfinThe theorem misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective proves that a specific five-channel carrier fails the surjective half of that test. misclassifiedFiveCarrier_not_parentSurjective · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelRecognitionTransportResidualsS18.lean