Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Pair Kernel Scale Bearing Self Dual Posting Law Positive Scale Preser
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Foundation Pair Kernel Scale Bearing Self Dual Posting Law Positive Scale Preser
In the Recognition Science framework, a complete posting law survives a change of scale only if that scale is the unit, a theorem that pins down the framework's native length.
The unit scale
In the Recognition Science framework, a posting is a discrete record of a recognition event, and a complete posting law is the full set of data that describes such an event: its location, its cost, and its native extent. The framework's library of machine-checked formal theorems proves a striking rigidity result about these laws: the only positive scale that preserves a complete posting law is the unit scale. In symbols, the theorem states that for any event and amplitude, the property of a positive scale preserving the complete posting law holds if and only if that scale equals 1.
This result is a theorem, not a definitional choice. It follows from the framework's core cost function, which assigns a cost to every possible dilation of an event. The cost function has a unique minimum at the unit dilation, and any departure from that unit increases the cost. The complete posting law records this cost, so any change of scale that leaves the law unchanged must leave the cost unchanged, which forces the scale to be the unit. The theorem's proof is fully formalized in the framework's library, with no unproved assumptions beyond the standard axioms of the underlying type theory.
The theorem has a direct consequence for the framework's native units. The native extent of a posting event, its length in the framework's own voxel standard, is defined at the unit dilation. The theorem guarantees that this extent is invariant under refinement: computing it at any positive integer refinement level gives the same value. This invariance is what makes the native extent a well-defined physical quantity, a single number that does not depend on how finely one chooses to sample the event.
The framework does not claim that this theorem selects the unit scale from first principles. The choice to define the posting law with the specific cost function that makes the unit scale special is a foundational model, a definitional choice, not a consequence of the framework's earlier axioms. The theorem proves properties of that model, but it does not prove that the model itself is forced. The framework also does not claim that this result provides a conversion from its native voxel to meters; such an external conversion remains outside the law.
What the theorem does establish is a precise sense in which the framework's native length is unique. Within the model, there is exactly one scale at which a complete posting law can be written down consistently, and that scale is the unit. This rigidity is what allows the framework to speak of a single native extent for an event, and it is a necessary step for any further claim about the framework's physical content.
THEOREM positiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- Anti-rescaling certificate: preserving the complete new law forces the
identity rechart. -/
theorem positiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27_iff
(event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3)
(ψ : WeylEventAmplitude27)
(scale : ℝ) :
PositiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27
event ψ scale ↔
scale = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, hpreserves⟩
have hlength := congrArg
(fun observation : WeylEventSite27 × ℝ × ℝ =>
observation.2.2) hpreserves
simpa [rechartCompletePostingObservation27,
completeScaleBearingPostingObservation27,
nativePostingExtentResponse27,
nativePostingExtentQuantum27,
unitPostingDilation,
Constants.RSNativeUnits.voxel] using hlength
· intro hscale
subst scale
simp [PositiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27,
rechartCompletePostingObservation27]
THEOREM scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27_unit_lt · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- Every non-native positive dilation is strictly more costly, pointwise in
the field state. -/
theorem scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27_unit_lt
(event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3)
(dilation : PostingDilationCoord)
(hdilation : dilation.1 ≠ 1)
(ψ : WeylEventAmplitude27) :
scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27
event unitPostingDilation ψ <
scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27 event dilation ψ := by
unfold scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27
simp only [unitPostingDilation, Cost.Jcost_unit0, zero_add]
exact lt_add_of_pos_left _
(Cost.Jcost_pos_of_ne_one dilation.1 dilation.2 hdilation)
THEOREM nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27_invariant · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- The event extent is independent of the number of phases used to represent
the carrier. -/
theorem nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27_invariant
(event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3)
(N M : ℕ) :
nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27 event N =
nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27 event M := by
rfl
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not prove that the unit scale is forced by the framework's earlier axioms. The theorem does not provide a conversion from the framework's native voxel to meters. The theorem does not apply to scales that are zero or negative.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical interpretation does the framework give to the unit scale that the theorem selects?
- How does the framework's native voxel relate to standard physical units like the meter?
- What is the role of the Weyl amplitude in the complete posting law?
- Does the theorem extend to scales that are not positive, such as zero or negative?
- What other foundational models in the framework make similar definitional choices?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM positiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- Anti-rescaling certificate: preserving the complete new law forces the identity rechart. -/ theorem positiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27_iff (event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3) (ψ : WeylEventAmplitude27) (scale : ℝ) : PositiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27 event ψ scale ↔ scale = 1 := by constructor · rintro ⟨_, hpreserves⟩ have hlength := congrArg (fun observation : WeylEventSite27 × ℝ × ℝ => observation.2.2) hpreserves simpa [rechartCompletePostingObservation27, completeScaleBearingPostingObservation27, nativePostingExtentResponse27, nativePostingExtentQuantum27, unitPostingDilation, Constants.RSNativeUnits.voxel] using hlength · intro hscale subst scale simp [PositiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27, rechartCompletePostingObservation27]The only positive scale that preserves a complete posting law is the unit scale. positiveScalePreservesCompletePostingLaw27_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.leanTHEOREM scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27_unit_lt · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- Every non-native positive dilation is strictly more costly, pointwise in the field state. -/ theorem scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27_unit_lt (event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3) (dilation : PostingDilationCoord) (hdilation : dilation.1 ≠ 1) (ψ : WeylEventAmplitude27) : scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27 event unitPostingDilation ψ < scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27 event dilation ψ := by unfold scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27 simp only [unitPostingDilation, Cost.Jcost_unit0, zero_add] exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (Cost.Jcost_pos_of_ne_one dilation.1 dilation.2 hdilation)The theorem follows from the framework's core cost function, which assigns a cost to every possible dilation of an event. scaleBearingSelfDualPostingAction27_unit_lt · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.leanTHEOREM nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27_invariant · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean
/-- The event extent is independent of the number of phases used to represent the carrier. -/ theorem nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27_invariant (event : RealizedPostingEvent3 3) (N M : ℕ) : nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27 event N = nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27 event M := by rflThe native extent of a posting event is invariant under refinement. nativePostingExtentAtRefinement27_invariant · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBearingSelfDualPostingLaw.lean