Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Pair Kernel Scale Breaking Source Residual
ARTICLE 5 claims 4 theorems 1 model
Foundation Pair Kernel Scale Breaking Source Residual
A machine-checked library isolates the one physical statement that selects the correct source magnitude in the framework's pair-kernel equation.
The missing physical law
The ledger, a discrete record of recognition events, admits two candidate magnitudes for a primitive posting, the basic unit of accounting in the framework. The current source premises, the starting assumptions about how postings attach to the ledger, allow both. This library isolates the single additional physical statement that separates them: one realized primitive posting carries the native action quantum, and its source coordinate is the multiplicative action dual. Together these select the reciprocal native-action magnitude, Candidate B.
The library proves that neither statement alone does the work. Source-action duality alone admits both banked magnitudes, pairing unit source with unit action in one model and reciprocal native source with native action in another. Fixing the native posting-action assignment alone still leaves the source map free. The two missing physical bits are independent, and both are needed to break the scale ambiguity.
The named law, NativeActionDualSourceLaw, is stated exactly: a positive source magnitude multiplied by the framework's constant hbar equals the Euler-J action unit. The library proves this law is equivalent to selecting Candidate B, that Candidate B satisfies it, and that Candidate A, the competing magnitude, is rejected. The current premises do not force this law; Candidate A satisfies every current premise and fails it. The law is therefore a genuine scale-breaking attachment, not a consequence already hidden in the old package.
When the two physical statements are supplied on a realized event, the attachment theorem fixes the source magnitude at Candidate B and applies the action-variation factor exactly once through the Green scale q/2. The pair-kernel source equation then uses the correct, action-normalized scale. The library banks the discrimination power of this law, its independence from the current premises, and its correctly normalized conditional attachment, all with no sorry and no new axiom.
THEOREM sourceActionDuality_alone_admits_distinct_banked_magnitudes · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- Source-action duality alone admits both banked source magnitudes. Candidate
A pairs unit source with unit action; Candidate B pairs reciprocal native
source with native action. The physical action normalization is therefore a
separate scale-breaking statement. -/
theorem sourceActionDuality_alone_admits_distinct_banked_magnitudes :
PostingSourceIsActionDual3
(@unitPostingActionCountermodel3 3 inferInstance)
(@unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 3 inferInstance) ∧
PostingSourceIsActionDual3
(@nativePostingActionCandidate3 3 inferInstance)
(@nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 3 inferInstance) ∧
∃ event : PostingPair3 3,
event ∈ realizedPrimitivePostingPairs3 3 ∧
unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event =
candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧
nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event =
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧
unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event ≠
nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event := by
refine
⟨unitAssignments_satisfy_sourceActionDuality,
nativeCandidates_source_is_actionDual, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨event, hevent, _hcert⟩ :=
canonicalGeneratorSource_consumer_exists
(N := 3) (by norm_num) (Equiv.refl (Fin 3))
have hA :
unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event =
candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by
change (1 : ℝ) = candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval
exact candidateA_sourceMagnitude_eq_one.symm
have hB :
nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event =
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by
rfl
refine ⟨event, hevent, hA, hB, ?_⟩
intro heq
exact candidates_select_distinct_magnitudes
(hA.symm.trans (heq.trans hB))
MODEL NativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- HYPOTHESIS: one physical posting has native action and its positive source
coordinate is the multiplicative dual measured in the Euler-J action unit.
The statement is target-blind and contains no continuum readout. -/
def NativeActionDualSourceLaw (sourceMagnitude : ℝ) : Prop :=
0 < sourceMagnitude ∧
sourceMagnitude * Constants.hbar = eulerJActionUnit
THEOREM nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB · candidateB_satisfies_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- The proposed native-action dual law selects exactly Candidate B. This is
a sufficiency theorem for the named physical law, not a derivation of the law
from the current source premises. -/
theorem nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB
(sourceMagnitude : ℝ) :
NativeActionDualSourceLaw sourceMagnitude ↔
sourceMagnitude = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by
change
(0 < sourceMagnitude ∧
sourceMagnitude * Constants.hbar = eulerJActionUnit) ↔
sourceMagnitude = nativeActionQuantumInv
rw [← nativeActionQuantum_eq_constants_hbar,
eulerJActionUnit_eq_one]
exact nativeQuantumSourceLaw_iff_inv sourceMagnitude
theorem candidateB_satisfies_nativeActionDualSourceLaw :
NativeActionDualSourceLaw
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval :=
(nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB _).2 rfl
/-- Independent discrimination: the native-action dual law rejects the
one-act source candidate because the two banked magnitudes are distinct. -/
theorem nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA :
¬ NativeActionDualSourceLaw
candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by
intro hA
exact candidates_select_distinct_magnitudes
((nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB _).1 hA)
THEOREM currentPremises_do_not_force_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- The new law is not hidden in the old package: Candidate A satisfies every
current premise and fails the native-action dual law. -/
theorem currentPremises_do_not_force_nativeActionDualSourceLaw :
¬ (∀ sourceMagnitude : ℝ,
CurrentRecognitionSourcePremises sourceMagnitude →
NativeActionDualSourceLaw sourceMagnitude) := by
intro hforce
exact nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA
(hforce _
candidateA_satisfies_currentRecognitionSourcePremises)
THEOREM physicalAttachment_attaches_candidateB_at_actionNormalizedScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- If the two missing physical statements are supplied on a realized event,
the source magnitude is Candidate B and its pair-kernel source equation uses
the independently fixed Green scale `q / 2`. -/
theorem physicalAttachment_attaches_candidateB_at_actionNormalizedScale
{N : ℕ} [NeZero N]
{postingAction sourceMagnitude : PostingPair3 N → ℝ}
(hphysical :
PhysicalPostingMagnitudeAttachment3
postingAction sourceMagnitude)
{event : PostingPair3 N}
(hevent : event ∈ realizedPrimitivePostingPairs3 N)
{n : ℕ}
(w : Fin n → Fin n → ℝ)
(e : Fin n → ℝ)
(a b : Fin n)
(hsymm : ∀ i j, w i j = w j i)
(haction :
PostingMagnitudeActionLaw
(sourceMagnitude event) w e a b) :
sourceMagnitude event =
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧
ScaledSourceEquation w (dipole a b)
(realGreenScaleFromPostingMagnitude
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval) e := by
have hsource :
sourceMagnitude event =
candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by
change sourceMagnitude event = nativeActionQuantumInv
exact
physicalPostingAttachment_forces_nativeActionQuantumInv
hphysical hevent
refine ⟨hsource, ?_⟩
rw [← hsource]
exact
(postingMagnitudeActionLaw_iff_scaledSourceEquation
(sourceMagnitude event) w e a b hsymm).1 haction
What this page does not claim
This library does not derive the native action dual law from the current recognition premises. This library does not prove that Candidate B is the physically realized magnitude in the actual universe. This library does not define what a realized primitive posting is physically.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical measurement would confirm that a primitive posting carries the native action quantum?
- How does the Euler-J action unit relate to the conventional action unit of Planck's constant?
- What is the pair-kernel source equation used for once the source magnitude is fixed?
- Does the native action dual law hold for all realized events or only for a distinguished subset?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM sourceActionDuality_alone_admits_distinct_banked_magnitudes · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- Source-action duality alone admits both banked source magnitudes. Candidate A pairs unit source with unit action; Candidate B pairs reciprocal native source with native action. The physical action normalization is therefore a separate scale-breaking statement. -/ theorem sourceActionDuality_alone_admits_distinct_banked_magnitudes : PostingSourceIsActionDual3 (@unitPostingActionCountermodel3 3 inferInstance) (@unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 3 inferInstance) ∧ PostingSourceIsActionDual3 (@nativePostingActionCandidate3 3 inferInstance) (@nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 3 inferInstance) ∧ ∃ event : PostingPair3 3, event ∈ realizedPrimitivePostingPairs3 3 ∧ unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event = candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧ nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧ unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event ≠ nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event := by refine ⟨unitAssignments_satisfy_sourceActionDuality, nativeCandidates_source_is_actionDual, ?_⟩ obtain ⟨event, hevent, _hcert⟩ := canonicalGeneratorSource_consumer_exists (N := 3) (by norm_num) (Equiv.refl (Fin 3)) have hA : unitSourceMagnitudeCountermodel3 event = candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by change (1 : ℝ) = candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval exact candidateA_sourceMagnitude_eq_one.symm have hB : nativeDualSourceMagnitudeCandidate3 event = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by rfl refine ⟨event, hevent, hA, hB, ?_⟩ intro heq exact candidates_select_distinct_magnitudes (hA.symm.trans (heq.trans hB))The library proves that source-action duality alone admits both banked source magnitudes. sourceActionDuality_alone_admits_distinct_banked_magnitudes · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.leanMODEL NativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- HYPOTHESIS: one physical posting has native action and its positive source coordinate is the multiplicative dual measured in the Euler-J action unit. The statement is target-blind and contains no continuum readout. -/ def NativeActionDualSourceLaw (sourceMagnitude : ℝ) : Prop := 0 < sourceMagnitude ∧ sourceMagnitude * Constants.hbar = eulerJActionUnitThe named law, NativeActionDualSourceLaw, is stated exactly: a positive source magnitude multiplied by the framework's constant hbar equals the Euler-J action unit. NativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.leanTHEOREM nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB · candidateB_satisfies_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- The proposed native-action dual law selects exactly Candidate B. This is a sufficiency theorem for the named physical law, not a derivation of the law from the current source premises. -/ theorem nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB (sourceMagnitude : ℝ) : NativeActionDualSourceLaw sourceMagnitude ↔ sourceMagnitude = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by change (0 < sourceMagnitude ∧ sourceMagnitude * Constants.hbar = eulerJActionUnit) ↔ sourceMagnitude = nativeActionQuantumInv rw [← nativeActionQuantum_eq_constants_hbar, eulerJActionUnit_eq_one] exact nativeQuantumSourceLaw_iff_inv sourceMagnitudetheorem candidateB_satisfies_nativeActionDualSourceLaw : NativeActionDualSourceLaw candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := (nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB _).2 rfl/-- Independent discrimination: the native-action dual law rejects the one-act source candidate because the two banked magnitudes are distinct. -/ theorem nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA : ¬ NativeActionDualSourceLaw candidateA_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by intro hA exact candidates_select_distinct_magnitudes ((nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB _).1 hA)The library proves this law is equivalent to selecting Candidate B, that Candidate B satisfies it, and that Candidate A, the competing magnitude, is rejected. nativeActionDualSourceLaw_iff_candidateB · candidateB_satisfies_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.leanTHEOREM currentPremises_do_not_force_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- The new law is not hidden in the old package: Candidate A satisfies every current premise and fails the native-action dual law. -/ theorem currentPremises_do_not_force_nativeActionDualSourceLaw : ¬ (∀ sourceMagnitude : ℝ, CurrentRecognitionSourcePremises sourceMagnitude → NativeActionDualSourceLaw sourceMagnitude) := by intro hforce exact nativeActionDualSourceLaw_rejects_candidateA (hforce _ candidateA_satisfies_currentRecognitionSourcePremises)The current premises do not force this law; Candidate A satisfies every current premise and fails it. currentPremises_do_not_force_nativeActionDualSourceLaw · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.leanTHEOREM physicalAttachment_attaches_candidateB_at_actionNormalizedScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean
/-- If the two missing physical statements are supplied on a realized event, the source magnitude is Candidate B and its pair-kernel source equation uses the independently fixed Green scale `q / 2`. -/ theorem physicalAttachment_attaches_candidateB_at_actionNormalizedScale {N : ℕ} [NeZero N] {postingAction sourceMagnitude : PostingPair3 N → ℝ} (hphysical : PhysicalPostingMagnitudeAttachment3 postingAction sourceMagnitude) {event : PostingPair3 N} (hevent : event ∈ realizedPrimitivePostingPairs3 N) {n : ℕ} (w : Fin n → Fin n → ℝ) (e : Fin n → ℝ) (a b : Fin n) (hsymm : ∀ i j, w i j = w j i) (haction : PostingMagnitudeActionLaw (sourceMagnitude event) w e a b) : sourceMagnitude event = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval ∧ ScaledSourceEquation w (dipole a b) (realGreenScaleFromPostingMagnitude candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval) e := by have hsource : sourceMagnitude event = candidateB_sourceMagnitudeExpr.eval := by change sourceMagnitude event = nativeActionQuantumInv exact physicalPostingAttachment_forces_nativeActionQuantumInv hphysical hevent refine ⟨hsource, ?_⟩ rw [← hsource] exact (postingMagnitudeActionLaw_iff_scaledSourceEquation (sourceMagnitude event) w e a b hsymm).1 hactionWhen the two physical statements are supplied on a realized event, the attachment theorem fixes the source magnitude at Candidate B and applies the action-variation factor exactly once through the Green scale q/2. physicalAttachment_attaches_candidateB_at_actionNormalizedScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelScaleBreakingSourceResidual.lean